The cannabis sacrament — optional, and governed by restraint.
This is the Observance's full position on cannabis as a religious sacrament. We publish it in long form because the most common misreading of our doctrine is the one we are most concerned about: that we are a "cannabis church." We are not. We are a church that recognizes cannabis as an optional sacrament. The difference between those two things is the entire doctrine.
The position, in one paragraph
Cannabis is recognized in the foundational doctrine of the Observance of the Sun as an optional sacrament for adult practitioners (twenty-one years and older), used intentionally to support stillness and reflective awareness during the practice. Its use is never required, never expected, and never spiritually privileged over non-use. The governing principle for the sacrament is the same governing principle for everything else in the Observance: restraint. If cannabis sharpens your attention during the practice, use it intentionally. If it dulls your attention, the practice is better served by your sobriety. The Observance is not a place to use cannabis recreationally under religious cover, and any practitioner who treats it that way is misreading the doctrine.
Why we recognize it at all
Every major religion has a sacrament — a material thing taken into the body, with intention, that the tradition considers spiritually significant. Wine in the Catholic Mass. Wafers in the Eucharist. Salt in some Hindu traditions. Honey, water, herbs, fire. Sacraments are not the practice itself; they are the body's participation in the practice. We recognize cannabis in this tradition for two reasons.
First, because cannabis, used in the right amount and at the right moment, can quiet the inventory of small distractions a person carries into a sunset. The practice does not require quieting that inventory — many people find the inventory quiets itself after a few weeks of consistent practice — but we will not pretend that pharmacologically assisted stillness is somehow less authentic than unassisted stillness. Both are practice.
Second, because California has spent the better part of a decade re-integrating cannabis into adult life with deliberation and law, and because the existence of a religion that recognizes cannabis without centering it is, on its own, a useful contribution to the cultural conversation about substance and intention.
How restraint actually works in practice
Restraint is the spine of the entire Observance, not a side note. It governs phone use during the practice. It governs how often we ask for money. It governs the architecture of the practice itself — twenty minutes before, twenty minutes after, no more, no less. When we say cannabis is governed by restraint, we mean that the same discipline applies. A practitioner who uses cannabis once a week with intention, before a sunset, is exercising the sacrament. A practitioner who uses cannabis several times a day and happens to also watch sunsets is not. The Observance does not police any of this. We do not require disclosure. We are not a tribunal. But the doctrine is unambiguous: the sacrament is the use that serves the practice, and any use that does not serve the practice is not the sacrament.
How this is different from cannabis-centered churches
The most well-known precedent is the First Church of Cannabis, founded in Indianapolis in 2015 by Bill Levin, granted 501(c)(3) status in record time, and built explicitly around cannabis as primary sacrament. We have nothing but respect for First Church of Cannabis — they did the hard legal work that mapped the modern terrain for cannabis-recognizing religions and the IRS treatment that flowed from their case is the precedent our own posture sits on top of. But the doctrinal posture is fundamentally different.
First Church of Cannabis is, by design, a religion of cannabis. The Observance of the Sun is a religion of paying attention to the natural world that recognizes cannabis as one of several materials a practitioner may, with discipline, bring to that attention. The center of gravity is not the substance. The center of gravity is the horizon. The substance is one of many possible aids to keeping your attention there.
This distinction is also why we are not at risk of being read as a recreational vehicle. Recreational cannabis use is legal in California for adults and does not require a religious frame. If a practitioner wants to use cannabis recreationally, the law permits it directly. The sacrament has a narrower meaning and a stricter standard.
The legal posture
California permits adult-use cannabis under state law (Proposition 64, 2016). The Observance does not provide, distribute, or sell cannabis to anyone for any purpose. Practitioners who choose to use cannabis as a sacrament do so independently, lawfully, and at their own discretion. The Observance does not host gatherings in which cannabis is consumed as part of the gathering itself. Where federal law and state law diverge — cannabis remains a Schedule I controlled substance federally — the Observance's posture is unambiguous: we do not facilitate consumption, we do not transport, we do not assist. The recognition in our doctrine is a recognition of practitioner agency, not an operational program of the church.
The relevant federal framework for any religious organization that recognizes a controlled substance is the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 (RFRA), as interpreted in Gonzales v. O Centro Espírita Beneficente União do Vegetal (2006) and its progeny. We do not currently invoke RFRA, because we do not need to — our doctrine does not depend on practitioners obtaining cannabis through religious channels, only on adult practitioners exercising their own lawful agency.
If you are a journalist writing about this
The most common framing we will push back on is "Observance of the Sun is the new cannabis church." It is not. It is a small California religious nonprofit whose practice is a twenty-minute sunset, and which recognizes — carefully, optionally, with restraint — that cannabis has a place in adult spiritual life when used with intention. The story of our cannabis posture is the story of how a religion can recognize a substance without becoming about that substance. The contrast with First Church of Cannabis is real and worth writing about. The contrast is the entire point.
Founder contact for questions on this doctrine: bobby@trainingties.com